29 Jan 2024
We asked dairy farmers for their feeding strategies and how to balance animal welfare, flexibility and sustainability on their dairy farms. It turned out that most of the milk producers exactly know what they are aiming for, but their current feeding technology prevents them from reaching their full potential.
Thanks to the excellent customer feedback from the market, GEA engineers were able to bridge several of these hurdles and launch the GEA DairyFeed F4500, an autonomously driving feeding robot that mixes and distributes the feed, pushes it towards the cows and enables fresh feed intake for all cows all day long while minimizing feed losses. For dairy farmers this comes with several advantages, such as healthier cows, higher milk yields, more flexibility by freeing up time from routing work and easy implementation of the system without any reconstruction work on the farm.
After the installation of the GEA feeding robot, milk production jumped from 28 to 36 liters per cow per day. There is no longer competition at the feeding table between the cows, even heifers have easy access to fresh feed and the opportunity to prepare them to express their f ull milk production potential. - Clémence & Luc Poussier, France
Tune in to GEA Dairy Farming Insights - the infotainment podcast for the dairy farming network!
Whether you are experienced farmer, just starting out or interested in the world of dairy, join us as we explore the ever-evolving field of farming and tell stories of success, challenges and innovation. We will be talking about modern and future oriented milk production, based on our Next Generation Farming pillars: animal welfare, flexibility and sustainability for the better.
Join our cowmunity that takes you on a journey through the vastness of milk production - your source of knowledge and inspiration in every episode!
The team behind GEA's latest automated feeding technology poses for a group photo.
One trend in dairy farming stands out over the last several decades: Increases in the milk yield per cow have doubled or even tripled in some countries. In Germany, for example, the number of dairy cows decreased from 6.4 million in 1990 to 3.9 million today. At the same time, milk production per cow on average has nearly increased by 50 percent. Fewer dairy cows are feeding many more people, and this is largely because of advances in breeding, cow health, feeding and overall efficiency on the farm.
Scientific research shows a clear connection between cow milk production performance and feeding strategies. Parameters such as feed frequency, animal grouping, feed and mixing quality make the difference between average production rates and exceptional ones. The positive impact: Good feeding strategies will immediately result in a reduction of GHG emissions per animal. Increasing the milk production per cow is considered a powerful strategy to lower greenhouse gas emissions per kilogram of milk produced.
Model calculations show that increasing milk production can have a positive impact on GHG when the handling of the complete farm product (milk and beef) is taken into consideration. The example calculation indicates a drop from 9,578 to 7,689 kilograms CO2 per cow and per year with an increase in a cow’s milk production from 6,000 to 8,000 kilograms milk a year. This reduction in CO2 emissions is basically driven by the reduction of enteric fermentation, manure and soil N2O.
Feeding without a fully automated system accounts for approximately 25 percent of the total working time requirements on a farm. A study conducted on European farms with an average size of 120 animals can save 112.15 minutes per day with an automated feeding system compared to a conventional one. This makes up for a significant reduction in labor time and, as a consequence, cost. It also lessens the burden to find new workers. Results at the same time showed farmers shared that they gained greater flexibility in their working hours while getting more accurate herd feeding.
A recommended feeding strategy is to increase the number of times that animals are fed during the day. As a ruminant, a cow needs its rumen microorganisms to have a good environment to optimally digest feed. The ideal pH in the rumen is around 5.5 to 6. Ruminal microorganisms do not adapt well to changes in the pH level, and an efficient way to maintain the pH in the rumen is to provide feed all day long.
“Cows also have a tendency to sort against low particles, eating therefore an unbalanced diet that will influence negatively the rumen pH,” explains feeding expert Hennings. Therefore, proper distribution of the feed mix ration is always a matter of time. Once the mix ration is distributed to the animals, the degradation of the nutritional value starts. It is important that cows maintain access to the feed bunk at all times to be able to maintain a proper feed and nutrient intake.
The usual practice on dairy farms is to push-up feed to allow all the cows to have access, but this does not ensure good quality of the ration provided to all cows. Studies show that cows had more equal access to feed throughout the day when the ration was distributed more frequently. Lower ranked cows were also not moved as much or as often, meaning they were able to feed more often with better access to the fodder. More frequent feeding also shows that cows tend to distribute their feeding time more evenly during the day.
In summary, for farms with conventional feeding technology, frequent feeding appears to be a labor-intensive activity. With automation, it is only limited to the number of animals in a group. The only remaining challenge is to get enough volume in a mixing batch to have a homogeneous feed mix.
I used to spend a lot of time feeding my cows, but now, with the F4500, this has become much easier. I can offer specific rations for four different groups from calves to cows with a minimal investment of time. - Johannes Nickel, Germany
Finally, the energy mix changes with automated feeding systems. Data show that farmers use 18 liters of diesel per cow a year to feed their herd with the mixer wagon in a conventional feeding setting. One liter of diesel represents 2.65 kilograms of CO2, according to the Institute für Technologie (KIT). Automated feeding systems use electricity as a source of energy. In a study conducted by the Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture in 2015, an automated GEA MixFeeder system consumed 21.36 kilowatt-hours per animal a year. That’s 336 grams of CO2 equivalents in the form of energy mix as measured in 2020. Taking these values as a baseline for dairy cow farm with 200 heads, the emissions in a conventional feeding setting are 9,540 kilograms of CO2 per year. With automated feeding, the emissions drop to 1,435.4 kilograms per year.
Considering the effort of different governments to improve the energy mix of electricity to more sustainable sources, it is foreseeable that the CO2 values per kilowatt-hour will be lower in the upcoming years.